Build your own time tracking or better buy and customize?

You have specific project structures, your own processes and workflows. You have tried several tools but none really reflects your reality. Then the idea “we will just build our own time tracking” often feels like the logical next step.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Customers who trust time cockpit
doka logo
dynatrace logo
kuka logo
lpa logo
softline logo
valantic logo

Is it worth building your own time tracking software?

A realistic look at effort, risks and alternatives.

Many companies face the same challenge. They need a time tracking system that fits their projects, roles, billing models and processes perfectly. Standard tools seem rigid, pricing models and modules are hard to evaluate and the conclusion becomes:

“Our requirements are so specific that we need to build our own time tracking.”

Developing your own solution may seem obvious but often leads to high ongoing costs, complex maintenance and long-term dependence on the internal development team. This is exactly where a customizable standard solution such as time cockpit comes in.

Build your own time tracking or use a customizable standard solution?

A direct comparison
  • Build your own time tracking
  • Full control over features and future development
  • High initial effort for planning, architecture and implementation
  • You are fully responsible for maintenance, security updates and legal changes
  • Limited functionality at the beginning that only grows slowly over time
  • Strong dependency on individual developers and their knowledge
  • Not part of your company’s core business
  • Hidden total cost throughout the entire lifecycle
  • Customizable standard solution (for example time cockpit)
  • Immediately usable core features
  • Regular updates, security and legal adjustments included
  • Comprehensive feature set already in the standard product
  • Customizable data model, validations and business logic
  • Additional custom features can be developed when needed
  • Independence through open interfaces and internal customization options
  • Fast integration via Web API
  • Personal consulting and support
  • Predictable costs

In-house development vs. customizable standard product

In-house development offers high flexibility but also significant burden

Companies that build their own time tracking system take responsibility for:

  • planning, implementation and continuous development
  • security, updates and compliance with legal requirements
  • framework upgrades and system operations
  • support for new working time models
  • error analysis and long-term maintenance

The result is often a system that works but brings substantial risks. Know-how depends on specific individuals, enhancements take longer than anticipated and the system quickly reaches its technical limits.

Custom Development Challenges

Included out of the box and ready to use

time cockpit gives you a professional foundation:

  • project and activity time tracking
  • working time tracking including breaks, time models and overtime
  • absence management
  • budget and utilization overviews
  • activity tracking
  • roles and permissions system
  • secure cloud operation in the EU

This foundation covers typical requirements without any development effort.

Time Cockpit in the browser

Customize instead of starting from scratch

Where you have special needs, time cockpit can be extended:

  • custom data model and user interface
  • additional fields and entities
  • individual logic and validations
  • automation and workflows
  • integrations via the Web API
  • custom reports and dashboards

This allows the system to reflect your processes precisely with the flexibility of in-house development but without its downsides.

No vendor lock in. Extend it yourself and stay independent

Many companies fear dependency on software vendors. Time cockpit is intentionally designed to be open.

  • customizations can be implemented internally or by partners
  • the data model is fully extensible
  • all data is available through open interfaces
  • you decide how deep you want to integrate or extend

This keeps you in control without the burden of building a full product yourself.

Vendor lock-in

When a customizable standard solution is the better choice

A solution such as time cockpit is ideal for companies that:

  • need to support complex or individual processes
  • want a stable and maintainable platform
  • seek flexibility without building their own product
  • do not see time tracking as part of their core business
  • still need professional and reliable functionality
Customizable Standard Solution

Start fast, stay flexible and reduce long-term effort

Building a complete time tracking solution yourself may sound like the ultimate freedom. In practice it leads to high costs and constant maintenance work.

A customizable standard solution provides:

  • immediately usable features
  • high extensibility
  • long-term future readiness
  • low internal development effort
  • full control over data and processes

You get a system that works today and grows with your needs tomorrow.

Startup Speed Scalability